aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/data/samples/current/en/the_wealth_of_networks.yochai_benkler.sst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'data/samples/current/en/the_wealth_of_networks.yochai_benkler.sst')
-rw-r--r--data/samples/current/en/the_wealth_of_networks.yochai_benkler.sst4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/data/samples/current/en/the_wealth_of_networks.yochai_benkler.sst b/data/samples/current/en/the_wealth_of_networks.yochai_benkler.sst
index bf7935b..da86aa2 100644
--- a/data/samples/current/en/the_wealth_of_networks.yochai_benkler.sst
+++ b/data/samples/current/en/the_wealth_of_networks.yochai_benkler.sst
@@ -3067,7 +3067,7 @@ The structure of public inquiry, debate, and collective action exemplified by th
It is common today to think of the 1990s, out of which came the Supreme Court's opinion in /{Reno v. ACLU}/, as a time of naïve optimism about the Internet, expressing in political optimism the same enthusiasm that drove the stock market bubble, with the same degree of justifiability. An ideal liberal public sphere did not, in fact, burst into being from the Internet, fully grown like Athena from the forehead of Zeus. The detailed criticisms of the early claims about the democratizing effects of the Internet can be characterized as variants of five basic claims:
-{won_benkler_7_3a.png "Figure 7.3b: Internal E-mails Translated to Political and Judicial Action" }http://www.jus.uio.no/sisu
+{won_benkler_7_3b.png "Figure 7.3b: Internal E-mails Translated to Political and Judicial Action" }http://www.jus.uio.no/sisu
1. /{Information overload.}/ A basic problem created when everyone can speak is that there will be too many statements, or too much information. Too ,{[pg 234]}, many observations and too many points of view make the problem of sifting through them extremely difficult, leading to an unmanageable din. This overall concern, a variant of the Babel objection, underlies three more specific arguments: that money will end up dominating anyway, that there will be fragmentation of discourse, and that fragmentation of discourse will lead to its polarization.
={ Babel objection ;
@@ -5788,7 +5788,7 @@ We have an opportunity to change the way we create and exchange information, kno
--~#
-1~blurb Blurb
+1~!blurb Blurb
_1 "In this book, Benkler establishes himself as the leading intellectual of the information age. Profoundly rich in its insight and truth, this work will be the central text for understanding how networks have changed how we understand the world. No work to date has more carefully or convincingly made the case for a fundamental change in how we understand the economy of society." Lawrence Lessig, professor of law, Stanford Law School