diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'data/v1/sisu_markup_samples/non-free/the_cathedral_and_the_bazaar.eric_s_raymond.sst')
| -rw-r--r-- | data/v1/sisu_markup_samples/non-free/the_cathedral_and_the_bazaar.eric_s_raymond.sst | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/data/v1/sisu_markup_samples/non-free/the_cathedral_and_the_bazaar.eric_s_raymond.sst b/data/v1/sisu_markup_samples/non-free/the_cathedral_and_the_bazaar.eric_s_raymond.sst index e54e85a..bba13e6 100644 --- a/data/v1/sisu_markup_samples/non-free/the_cathedral_and_the_bazaar.eric_s_raymond.sst +++ b/data/v1/sisu_markup_samples/non-free/the_cathedral_and_the_bazaar.eric_s_raymond.sst @@ -36,9 +36,9 @@ @abstract: I anatomize a successful open-source project, fetchmail, that was run as a deliberate test of the surprising theories about software engineering suggested by the history of Linux. I discuss these theories in terms of two fundamentally different development styles, the "cathedral" model of most of the commercial world versus the "bazaar" model of the Linux world. I show that these models derive from opposing assumptions about the nature of the software-debugging task. I then make a sustained argument from the Linux experience for the proposition that "Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow", suggest productive analogies with other self-correcting systems of selfish agents, and conclude with some exploration of the implications of this insight for the future of software. -:A~ The Cathedral and the Bazaar +:A~ @title @author -:B~ Eric Steven Raymond +% :B~ Eric Steven Raymond 1~ The Cathedral and the Bazaar |