diff options
authorRalph Amissah <ralph@amissah.com>2015-09-29 23:55:09 -0400
committerRalph Amissah <ralph@amissah.com>2015-09-30 00:14:45 -0400
commit1abfbba3b559ccdd72ebc4941f19ae246e3490b3 (patch)
parentbook index markup related touches (diff)
bibliography related, minor
3 files changed, 7 insertions, 4 deletions
index 385b8e6..5188401 100644
@@ -12,6 +12,9 @@ Reverse Chronological:
* book index markup related touches
Democratizing Innovation; Free Culture; Two Bits; Viral Spiral
+ * bibliography related, minor
+ Free For All; Two Bits
* sisu-markup-samples_7.1.1.orig.tar.xz (2015-05-21:20/4) [version follows sisu]
diff --git a/data/samples/current/en/free_for_all.peter_wayner.sst b/data/samples/current/en/free_for_all.peter_wayner.sst
index d105996..eae2188 100644
--- a/data/samples/current/en/free_for_all.peter_wayner.sst
+++ b/data/samples/current/en/free_for_all.peter_wayner.sst
@@ -3086,7 +3086,8 @@ url: http://www.nytimes.com/library/1999/01/biztech/articles/15soft.html
au: Bronson, Po
ti: Manager's Journal Silicon Valley Searches for an Image
src: Wall Street Journal
-yr: June 8, 1998
+yr: 1998-06-08
+% yr: June 8, 1998
au: Bronson, Po
ti: Nudist on the Late Shift: And Other True Tales of Silicon Valley
@@ -3161,7 +3162,7 @@ yr: 1981
au: Gleick, James
ti: Control Freaks
src: New York Times
-yr: July 19, 1998-07-19
+yr: 1998-07-19
au: Gleick, James
ti: Broken Windows Theory
@@ -3171,6 +3172,7 @@ yr: 1999-03-21
au: FatBrain.com
ti: Interview with Linus Torvalds
src: FatBrain.com, May 1999
+yr: 1999
url: http://www.kt.opensrc.org/interviews/ti19990528_fb.html
au: Jelinek, Jakub
diff --git a/data/samples/current/en/two_bits.christopher_kelty.sst b/data/samples/current/en/two_bits.christopher_kelty.sst
index 63fde12..3beaca7 100644
--- a/data/samples/current/en/two_bits.christopher_kelty.sst
+++ b/data/samples/current/en/two_bits.christopher_kelty.sst
@@ -4441,8 +4441,6 @@ The open-access movement, and examples like Connexions, are attempts at maintain
Understanding how Free Software works and how it has developed along with the Internet and certain practices of legal and cultural critique may be essential to understanding the reliable foundation of knowledge production and circulation on which we still seek to ground legitimate forms of governance. Without Free Software, the only response to the continuing forms of excess we associate with illegitimate, unaccountable, unjust forms of governance might just be mute cynicism. With it, we are in possession of a range of practical tools, structured responses and clever ways of working through our complexity toward the promises of a shared imagination of legitimate and just governance. There is no doubt room for critique—and many scholars will demand it—but scholarly critique will have to learn how to sit, easily or uneasily, with Free Software as critique. Free Software can also exclude, just as any public or public sphere can, but this is not, I think, cause for resistance, but cause for joining. The alternative would be to create no new rules, no new practices, no new procedures—that is, to have what we already have. Free Software does not belong to geeks, and it is not the only form of becoming public, but it is one that will have a profound structuring effect on any forms that follow.
-:B~ Bibliography
1~!bibliography Bibliography
% ,{[pg 349]},