ssp test-abstraction-ssp.sh script minor

- test/test-abstraction-ssp.sh script minor improvement

- result change reflects content corrections: name spelling & a markup
  error, document abstracton, ssp verified ok (may be considered a test)

(assisted by Claude-Code)

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/test/reference/abstraction/the_autonomous_contract.ralph_amissah.en.ssp b/test/reference/abstraction/the_autonomous_contract.ralph_amissah.en.ssp
index 22f01c3..be1aa1b 100644
--- a/test/reference/abstraction/the_autonomous_contract.ralph_amissah.en.ssp
+++ b/test/reference/abstraction/the_autonomous_contract.ralph_amissah.en.ssp
@@ -599,8 +599,8 @@
 .part: body
 .ocn_off: true
 .is_of_type: para
-.sha256: C4B6301574EFFA88E9488D08044D3674D08CEC0C4307664BD86BDBA30C049FCE
-| Within the traditional municipal order a limited degree of autonomy is available in contract. Autonomy is here used in the sense of reducing the relevance of specific national laws. This is achieved as discussed through: the selection of the law of a state that applies uniform law; the use of uniform rules and principles; and/or the use of negotiated standard contracts. There are problems however, with state's judiciaries' limited ability to disengage themselves from their traditional legal process, methods of legal reasoning, use of sources, and interpretation of uniform law, principles, rules and contracts. In addition to these there are problems associated with the enforcement of claims in other states world-wide as required for international commerce. These constraints have long represented a hindrance to the business community that has sought and found a preferable solution in international commercial arbitration. This may be further enhanced through the selection of a-national law as the governing law of the contract under arbitration, such as ⑆/┨ lex mercatoria ┣/. This a-national regulatory order is made possible by: ⑆*┨ (a) ┣* States' acceptance of ⑆_┨freedom of contract┣_ (⑆/┨ odre public ┣/ or public policy excepted). ⑆*┨ (b) ┣* Sanctity of contract embodied in the principle ⑆/┨ ⑆_┨pacta sunt servanda┣_ ┣/. ⑆*┨ (c) ┣* Written contractual selection of dispute resolution by ⑆_┨international commercial arbitration┣_ - ⑆/┨ ad hoc ┣/ or institutional, usually under internationally accepted arbitration rules. ⑆*┨ (d) ┣* Enforcement: arbitration where necessary borrowing the state apparatus for ⑆_┨law enforcement through the  ⑆/┨ New York Convention┣_ on Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards 1958 ┣/. ⑆*┨ (e) ┣* Greater transnational effect is achieved through the exclusion of state law as governing the contract. Usually substituting the choice of general principles of law or ⑆/┨ ⑆_┨lex mercatoria┣_ ┣/ as governing the contract, or calling upon the arbitrators to act as ⑆/┨ amiable compositeur ┣/ or ⑆/┨ ex aequo et bono ┣/. For increased predictability preferably through application of the ⑆/┨ UNIDROIT Principles ┣/.
+.sha256: B784E23AE45968CFE43BFA2AA417E1F1553A763C0A2D8EC7FA3E2758BE8C92A0
+| Within the traditional municipal order a limited degree of autonomy is available in contract. Autonomy is here used in the sense of reducing the relevance of specific national laws. This is achieved as discussed through: the selection of the law of a state that applies uniform law; the use of uniform rules and principles; and/or the use of negotiated standard contracts. There are problems however, with state's judiciaries' limited ability to disengage themselves from their traditional legal process, methods of legal reasoning, use of sources, and interpretation of uniform law, principles, rules and contracts. In addition to these there are problems associated with the enforcement of claims in other states world-wide as required for international commerce. These constraints have long represented a hindrance to the business community that has sought and found a preferable solution in international commercial arbitration. This may be further enhanced through the selection of a-national law as the governing law of the contract under arbitration, such as ⑆/┨ lex mercatoria ┣/. This a-national regulatory order is made possible by: ⑆*┨ (a) ┣* States' acceptance of ⑆_┨freedom of contract┣_ (⑆/┨ odre public ┣/ or public policy excepted). ⑆*┨ (b) ┣* Sanctity of contract embodied in the principle ⑆/┨ ⑆_┨pacta sunt servanda┣_ ┣/. ⑆*┨ (c) ┣* Written contractual selection of dispute resolution by ⑆_┨international commercial arbitration┣_ - ⑆/┨ ad hoc ┣/ or institutional, usually under internationally accepted arbitration rules. ⑆*┨ (d) ┣* Enforcement: arbitration where necessary borrowing the state apparatus for law enforcement through the ⑆/┨ ⑆_┨New York Convention┣_ on Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards 1958 ┣/. ⑆*┨ (e) ┣* Greater transnational effect is achieved through the exclusion of state law as governing the contract. Usually substituting the choice of general principles of law or ⑆/┨ ⑆_┨lex mercatoria┣_ ┣/ as governing the contract, or calling upon the arbitrators to act as ⑆/┨ amiable compositeur ┣/ or ⑆/┨ ex aequo et bono ┣/. For increased predictability preferably through application of the ⑆/┨ UNIDROIT Principles ┣/.
 
 [30] heading :3
 .part: body